[gnea/grbl-Mega Issue#19] Doxygen?

#1 – chamnit 于 2017-02-25

@tgit23 : Thanks for sharing. At the moment, I’m working on overhauling significant parts of the code into a HAL. This basically means I’m moving on from how things are written in Grbl, because I had to make some unsavory coding to make things fit into the 328. This new code will be introduced as a new project and I would welcome documentation help there when it’s released. I’m getting close to done but it’s not available to the public until it is.

#2 – TGit-Tech 于 2017-02-25

This is GREAT NEWS! The reason for the doxygen changes was actually a distraction just to grasp a better understanding of the code so I could implement uni-polar stepper support in the best possible way. Sounds like that’s going to be easier if not already on its way with a HAL.

I actually had started approaching this by adding lines in cpu_map.h
#define STEPPORTSET(i) STEP_PORT=i
#define DIRECTIONPORTSET(i) DIRECTION_PORT=i

and going through the ‘stepper.c’ code and doing a find/replace on lines such as:
STEPPORTSET((STEPPORT & ~STEPMASK) | st.step_outbits);

I guess I was attempting to abstract the PORT addressing; but if this is something your current work will make much easier – I’d just as soon wait for it. My email is on my github profile page @ https://github.com/tgit23 if you’d be interested in sharing what you have thus far; just out of my own curiosity

Also the changes to the code comments and the minor ‘beginning’ changes which I’d made are on the same repository as the doxygen publication source @ https://github.com/tgit23/grbl-Mega-Doxy just in case you wanted to check out the format for code comments I’d implemented. ( 1/2 done of course )