> 未分类 > [gnea/grbl-Mega Issue#122] Adaptive Multi-Axis Step-Smoothing(AMASS) levels vs DDS step generation and conversion details

[gnea/grbl-Mega Issue#122] Adaptive Multi-Axis Step-Smoothing(AMASS) levels vs DDS step generation and conversion details

未分类 bolang 4个月前 (10-15) 25次浏览

Issue #122 | 状态: 已关闭 | 作者: shamsiqbal | 创建时间: 2020-04-15

Hi
As grbl core is going to be on 32-bit route so i have question @chamnit can you please put some lights on it that what is the difference in performance when use DDS as step Pulse generation instead Bresenham algorithm what are the pros and cons of it

评论 (1)

#1 – chamnit 于 2020-04-16

Bresenham is a more numerically stable algorithm as it only uses integers.

原始Issue: https://github.com/gnea/grbl-Mega/issues/122

喜欢 (0)